News & Insights
Sort by:
Articles 3 results
Articles
02.03.2022
Delaware Court Latest to Point the Twitter Finger_ Tweets Can Constitute Actionable Expressions of Fact By: Amy Pearl, John C. Connell, and Peter L. Frattarelli, MLCR (January 2022)
Articles
08.03.2021
“How Do I Bind Thee (to an LLC Operating Agreement)? Let Me Count the Ways” By: Mark Oberstaedt & Amy Pearl, NJLJ (July 22, 2021).
Articles
02.09.2021
For New Jersey LLC Members, Silence Can Have Serious Ramifications
"For New Jersey LLC Members, Silence Can Have Serious Ramifications" By: Mark J. Oberstaedt and Amy E. Pearl, published in The New Jersey Law Journal.
Client Advisories 8 results
Client Advisories
08.21.2024
Federal Court Sets Aside FTC Ban on Non-Competes
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas has set aside the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) Non-Compete Clause Rule (“Rule”). In a ruling with nationwide effect, the court ordered that “the Rule shall not be enforced or otherwise take effect on its effective date of September 4, 2024 or thereafter.” This ruling bookends the first chapter of the FTC’s assault on non-compete agreements by way of rulemaking and eliminates the enormous uncertainty for employers previously staring down the Rule’s September 4 effective date and its mandatory notice requirement. In Ryan, LLC v. FTC, the court found that (1) the FTC lacked statutory authority to promulgate the Rule and (2) the Rule is arbitrary and capricious. As to its first finding, the court concluded that the FTC lacked authority to promulgate substantive rules regarding unfair methods of competition. And with respect to its second finding, the court held that the Rule is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) because it was unreasonably broad without any reasonable explanation. Having reached these conclusions, the court held that it was obligated to “hold unlawful” and “set aside” the Rule under the APA. In a break from its earlier preliminary injunction ruling – which stayed the Rule’s effective date only as to the plaintiffs in the case – the court explained that this setting aside has nationwide effect and is not limited to the named plaintiffs. Now that the FTC’s sweeping Rule has been set aside, employers can breathe a sigh of relief. However, an appeal is expected and hostility towards non-compete agreements still remains. Given this, employers should work with counsel to review existing agreements to ensure compliance with applicable state law while considering additional options to protect their legitimate business interests. You can read our previous advisories on the FTC’s Non-Compete Clause Rule here:
Client Advisories
07.08.2024
Federal Court in Texas Puts Hold on FTC's Ban - but Only for the Plaintiffs in That Case
Client Advisories
05.13.2024
In the News 1 result
In the News
07.08.2024
Federal Trade Commission's Broad Noncompete Ban Suffered A Legal Setback
The Federal Trade Commission's broad noncompete ban suffered a legal setback after a federal judge in Texas ruled against the agency on July 3rd. Partner Thomas Muccifori, chair of Archer's Trade Secret Protection & Restrictive Covenants Group and associate Amy Pearl provided insight on the ruling in the American City Business Journals article, "FTC Noncompete Ban Suffers Setback in First of Several Court Challenges," as well as in the IAM article, "FTC Non-Compete Rule "Arbitrary and Capricious," Court Rules." See below to read each article.
Speaking Engagements & Seminars 2 results
Speaking Engagements & Seminars
11.19.2021
Archer partner Mark Oberstaedt & associate Amy Pearl will present a webinar for the National Business Institute titled, "Contractual Damages & Indemnities in Plain English" on November 19, 2021.
Speaking Engagements & Seminars
03.25.2021
Ask Archer: A Fireside Chat on LLC Operating Agreements with Members of the Business Counseling Team
When: Thursday, March 25, 2021 10:00am - 10:30am